Peanut Gallery: I am in crisis… I do not recognize the country I have loved and lived in all my life. I do not understand today’s prevailing “culture.” I put the word in quotes because it looks more like a cess pool to me – catering to our basest nature (gangsta rap)… rather than encouraging us to soar to the heights of our God-given nature (flash mob).
We are so caught up in ourselves… in our own frantic activities… running to what, or from what… that we can no longer hear the music.
And now, the issue of legalizing/sanctifying gay marriage is at the forefront of the “culture wars.” Among the political/educational elite, there is no longer any room for civil discussion or debate. The lunatics are running the asylum… as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia discovered.
Digging his heels in, [Scalia] put to the students the following question, which goes right to the heart of the matter: “If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality,” he pointedly asked, “can we have them against murder? Can we have it against other things?”
Where is all this leading us? Regis Martin reflects on this very question in his important article re-posted below –
If a nation to be loved, as Burke once said, must be lovely, where does that leave those of us who look upon same sex marriage with abhorrence? At what point does cultural approval, followed by juridical vindication from the highest court in the land, so diminish the loveliness of our country that to withdraw one’s love and loyalty from it becomes the only tenable course to take?
These are serious times and Christians are facing serious issues. Please read Martin’s original article here, posted here at Crisis Magazine.
Special thanks to servus fidelis for bringing this important post to our attention.
______________________________________________
Scalia Protest at Princeton Raises an Important Question
by Regis Martin
When does it become impermissable for a self-governing people to pass laws that will ensure the survival of the things they love? When they no longer command a majority of the electorate? Is that the standard? Certainly among people of democratic disposition, it is a constitutional given that any time a plurality of voters take charge, they are more or less at liberty to set aside whatever arrangements were in place before they assumed control.
In other words, that massive tectonic shift in the culture we’ve been witnessing over these past fifty years, is about to be given formal and official sanction from the political process. All the awfulness of the culture, as it were, will sooner or later be codified into law.
Continue reading “Unlovley America – “Scalia Protest at Princeton Raises an Important Question” – Re-blog (Crisis Magazine)”
The Peanut Gallery 