Two U.S. Senators Apply an Anti-Christian Religious Test for Government Officials – reblog

Peanut Gallery:

“There is no other name, but the name of Jesus, by which we can be saved! There is salvation in no one else! God has given no other name under heaven by which we must be saved.” – Acts of the Apostles 4:12 NLT

The Story: In a confirmation hearing of an executive branch nominee, two U.S. senators imply that those who believe Jesus is the only way to salvation are “Islamophobic” and not fit for public office.

Why It Matters: Within the span of six minutes, two U.S. Senators—Sanders and Van Hollen—shamed the people of Vermont, Maryland, and the rest of the United States by establishing a new religious test for government officials.

[Read more…]

 

Who Was Paul Revere and Why Should You Care? | Prager U – Eric Metaxas

paul-revere-9456172-1-402

Do you know who Paul Revere was? He is one of America’s key historical figures. Want to know what he did? Eric Metaxas, New York Times #1 bestselling author, shares the remarkable story.

How a Christian invented basketball | Reblog Aleteia

How a Christian invented basketball

Thanks to James Naismith, many young people were brought to Christ through the game of basketball.

Faced with a group of restless young men snowed in at the International Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) Training School in Springfield, Massachusetts, physical education instructor James Naismith had to think of a new game to distract them from the cabin fever they were feeling.

With some added encouragement from his director, Naismith tested his ideas out for two weeks but nothing was working. Then on December 21, 1891 Naismith had a breaththrough.

“Something had to be done. One day I had an idea,” Naismith explained to a New York radio station. “I called the boys to the gym and divided them into two teams of nine and gave them an old soccer ball. I showed them two peach baskets I had nailed at each end of the gym, and I told them the idea was to throw the ball into the other team’s peach basket.” The game was called, “Basket Ball,” and the boys couldn’t get enough of it. They kept asking Naismith to let them play, but with the lack of any rules, brawls would break out on the floor.

Naismith then devised 13 original rules for the game of “Basket Ball” and wrote an article that was distributed to all YMCAs across the country. The game spread like wildfire and by 1898 Naismith was hired as the first men’s basketball coach at the University of Kansas.

Ever since, the game of basketball has been a staple of American culture and has increased in popularity every year, especially at the collegiate level. For example, in 2015 “March Madness” — the annual collegiate basketball tournaments for men and women — attracted 80.7 million people worldwide who watched the men’s tournament online through NCAA March Madness Live.

What’s interesting is that Naismith, while he created the game to entertain restless boys during the cold months of winter, also invented basketball “to win men for the Master through the gym.” This was in keeping with his general mission in life, one that he developed as he studied for a master’s degree from Montreal’s Presbyterian Theological College.

Naismith was convinced that “he could better exemplify the Christian life through sports than in the pulpit” and sought to “develop the whole person—mind, body and spirit” in the gym. As a result, he held basketball players to a high standard and wanted them to be virtuous. Naismith’s director, Luther Gulick, explained the Christian values that surrounded basketball in an article in 1897 where he wrote, “The game must be kept clean. It is a perfect outrage for an institution that stands for Christian work in the community to tolerate not merely ungentlemanly treatment of guests, but slugging and that which violates the elementary principles of morals… Excuse for the rest of the year any player who is not clean in his play.”

Michael Zogry, associate professor in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Kansas, further explained Naismith’s approach to sports and faith in an interview last year.

“His approach was to put Christianity out there in front of people and try to influence them through positive character development, but he reserved his formal preaching for when he was a guest minister at area churches.”

Basketball for Naismith was not simply a game, but an evangelization tool. In fact, during this time period the YMCAs had integrated the game into their mission trips and it is recorded that many young people were brought to Christ through these missionaries and the game of basketball. This is how basketball was brought to China (through YMCA missionaries), and it has since become one of the country’s most popular sports.

In the end, Naismith firmly believed in the connection of sports and faith and wrote, “Whenever I witness games in a church league, I feel that my vision, almost half a century ago, of the time when the Christian people would recognize the true value of athletics, has become a reality.”

Why America Must Lead | Prager University – Rasmussen

rasmussen-620x310

The world is on fire. Syria has fallen apart. Russia has seized Ukrainian land. And China is flexing its muscles. Who can put these fires out? As Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Denmark’s former Prime Minister and NATO’s former Secretary General explains, only the United States.

Truth, Terror and Nikki Haley’s Challenge at the UN – reblog Claudia Rosett

by Claudia Rosett, pjmedia.comFebruary 23, 2017 [original here]

Bravo yet again to Nikki Haley, America’s new ambassador to the United Nations. Speaking at an informal meeting of the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, Haley called out Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism, saying:

The United States will not hesitate to stand against the forces of terrorism, and that includes standing against the states that sponsor it, in particular the Islamic Republic of Iran.

This follows Haley’s refreshingly direct comments last week to the press — aptly praised by the New York Sun under the headline “Haley’s Comet” — in which Haley denounced the UN’s obsessive attacks on the democratic state of Israel. In those remarks, Haley lambasted the UN’s “double standards” as “breathtaking,” and threw in a mention of Iran as “the world’s number-one state sponsor of terror.” Here’s an excerpt:

Incredibly, the UN Department of Political Affairs has an entire division devoted to Palestinian affairs. Imagine that. There is no division devoted to illegal missile launches from North Korea. There is no division devoted to the world’s number one state-sponsor of terror, Iran. The prejudiced approach to Israeli-Palestinian issues does the peace process no favors. And it bears no relationship to the reality of the world around us.

ap_17048263215033-sized-770x415xt

With such remarks, Haley is bringing to the UN a voice of truth, decency, and plain old common sense that is a desperately needed departure from the usual diplomatic doubletalk. Credit her also for blocking the ploy by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to name as his special envoy to Libya a former prime minister of the Palestinian Authority, which is not a UN member state. The PA has been maneuvering for decades to obtain that status without keeping its promises to negotiate in good faith a lasting peace with Israel.

Haley is salvaging for the U.S. a role of integrity that, under President Barack Obama and his successive UN ambassadors, was all too often lamentably absent (recall Ambassador Susan Rice leading from behind on Libya, and Ambassador Samantha Power, who this past December abstained from vetoing Resolution 2334, with which the Security Council savaged Israel).

Both Haley and President Trump — who chose her — deserve credit for Haley’s stellar performance so far at the UN. On a number of vital issues not only has Haley hit the ground running, but in contrast to her predecessors of the past eight years, she has been heading in the right direction.

All that said, a warning is in order. This is the UN we are talking about — a mountain of unaccountable bureaucracy and moral sludge, where even for the best and brightest the job of trying to bring about any kind of genuine reform is like trying to clear a mudslide with a teaspoon.